Connect with us


Did AG Morrisey Break The Law?



A recent federal lawsuit has ignited controversy in the gubernatorial race, shedding light on the actions of Republican candidate Patrick Morrisey’s campaign and prompting questions about his responsibilities as the current Attorney General of West Virginia. The lawsuit, filed by DM Motor Inc., a business owned by Chris Miller and his family, accuses Morrisey’s campaign, a political action committee (PAC), and several media companies of copyright infringement.

The core issue revolves around the unauthorized use of original video content created by DM Motor, trading as Dutch Miller Kia, in television advertisements. The company asserts that these videos, designed to bolster its brand and drive sales, are protected under the Copyright Act of 1976. However, it alleges that both the Black Bear PAC and Morrisey’s campaign utilized portions of these videos without permission.

The lawsuit highlights a critical aspect of Morrisey’s role as the state’s top law enforcement officer—protecting the rights of individuals and businesses. As Attorney General, Morrisey is entrusted with upholding the law and ensuring that all parties, regardless of political affiliation, adhere to legal and ethical standards. Yet, the allegations of copyright infringement against his campaign raise concerns about his commitment to these principles.

In recent months, as Morrisey’s lead in the race for governor has diminished and more West Virginians have begun to scrutinize his character, reports of bullying tactics have surged. Critics argue that the use of copyrighted material without permission represents a blatant disregard for the rights of businesses like DM Motor. Furthermore, the refusal to cease and desist despite legal warnings raises questions about the campaign’s ethical conduct.

Amidst the competitive atmosphere of the gubernatorial race, it’s essential to remember the broader implications of this legal dispute. Beyond the electoral battleground, the outcome of the lawsuit will set a precedent regarding the intersection of copyright law, political speech, and corporate rights. It serves as a reminder that political ambitions should not supersede the rule of law or undermine the rights of individuals and businesses.

As the case unfolds in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, all eyes will be on Morrisey’s response and his campaign’s actions. Will he uphold the principles of justice and fairness, or will political expediency dictate his approach? The question remains: Did AG Morrisey break the law, and will West Virginians hold him accountable for his actions?


  • Staff Writer

    From the WV Statewide News Team. Articles depicting “Staff Writer” indicate the content was prepared by several members of the news team.


From the WV Statewide News Team. Articles depicting "Staff Writer" indicate the content was prepared by several members of the news team.